This website is presented in order to point out the obvious fact of overpopulation. Clarity is not politically oriented. It does not support or encourage, among other ideas: socialism, anti-Semitism, Islam, terrorism, Nazism whether old or neo, communism, dictatorship, tyranny, diversity, racism, multiculturalism, belligerent nationalism, sexual obsession, gender wrangling, feminism, so-called 'far right politics,' police states, fanaticism, etc. Any comments found on it that might superficially seem political should be understood as merely momentary opinion and criticism offered from a point of view probably quite different from that of the then observer, given that no two persons can occupy exactly the same space simultaneously.

Clarity is totally harmless. It cannot be construed as a 'hate crime.' Unlikely to be looked at by more than a handful of equally harmless readers it is even more unlikely to influence them or anyone else in the slightest.

Hidden in the words of the website is the solution to mankind's endless troubles, but it comes with a screen that forbids entry to states of stupefaction brought about by confusion and conflict within and without—and that of course rules out most of humanity.

Highly recommended: do read the whole publication. It is written and read entirely in presence!


A Freedom House writing team composed of seven women and just two men has  published results from their survey of the world's countries, which gives or takes away points according to the level of 'freedom' prevailing in those countries. Well worth a read.  

A note about the concept of 'freedom:' this rather romantic concept is as meaningless as absolute space unless it is informed by the opposite that defines it: limitation. Free speech is only an ideal; a clumsy but more honest definition would admit that limited freedom of speech that is to any degree public is permitted to a greater or lesser extent, depending on the particular regime in question. Under some regimes, as we know, pushing the limits imposed on a citizen's priviledge to speak out can result in death or imprisonment. In Britain, the slightest bit of free speech concerning the most insidious danger to its society, for example, is instantly regarded as a hate crime (which is evidently very attractive to the police force and treated as if nearly as bad as murder) and newspapers such as the popular tabloid Daily Mail will not allow comments from readers on any article that mentions said danger, despite having angered its readers by exposing one outrage after another in which Muslims* are central to the issue. We don't know where this censorship originates, but we suspect that it is part and parcel of the political agenda that the government of the UK is forcing through under the 'righteous and fair' banner of 'diversity.' The unstated idea is that miscegenation is inevitable so we had better get on with it and anyone who objects will be deemed fascist, neo-Nazi, racist, etc. Patriotism in Britain is increasingly frowned upon, unless it is utterly passive. Do notice the etymological connection: patriotism, from patris 'fatherland.' Britain is a country where Motherhood rules; the father tends to be marginalized—and angry. In a Freedom House cartoon, the proponent and fully armed defender of 'democracy and human rights' is of course depicted as a woman of Graeco-Roman times, while the nations, represented as impotent little men in mediaeval armour, huddle nervously behind her. But a feminist society cannot defend itself; to imagine so is to believe in the reality of a cartoon Wonder Woman. The only way such a society can buy time from an aggressor is to send out its businessmen to strike deals.

The Freedom House report is mainly concerned with the ideal of democracy versus tyranny; just where in the world these are operating is quite familiar to most of us, though it is something of a surprise to see the land of Chinggis Khan shown on their map as 'free.'

In point of fact, close examination shows that humanity itself is the unsung tyrant; it consists of billions of petty tyrants most of whom probably consider themselves perfectly normal people, who 'just want to get on with their lives.'

So in this fight for what is passionately believed to be truly right, we have in one corner the most hallowed Dame Democracy, standing for the tyranny of fairness for all and of freedom for the blindly reproducing womb, with guaranteed child support. And in the other corner we have the tyranny of the Big Boss Controller playing Supreme Being and getting bigger and more arrogant by the day.

'There was an old woman who lived in a shoe. She had so many children she didn't know what to do.' What better way  to sum up the perpetual dilemma of democracy or rule by housewife, where the specially selected children noisily argue their way through to abidingly unsatisfactory agreements?

In the other corner, we have the deeply psychotic, dynastic, stern father figure who, with his thoroughly corrupt cronies, rules with strict decisiveness; he readily murders, imprisons or enslaves any who step out of line or even question his authority. Despotism is no problem for one whose message to the world is cynicism: 'dog eat dog and I'm a bigger dog than you.'

It is noteworthy that the socialist ethic prevails in both kinds of government, even if a nominally 'conservative' group is in the driving seat for the time. The socialist drive is simply 'everything for the people' in the exploitation of the earth's resources! Needless to say, what is called nature has been waking up to this monstrous, disastrously anthropocentric creed and is hitting back with furious blows, particularly in the sphere of disease: terminal cancer is just as natural as your lunchtime healthfood snack. In the opposite corner from socialism, we have the freedom that allows any individual, group or blockhead to amass obscene amounts of money, such as is the case with pop groups, footballers and speculators, who greedily soak up whatever tribute their emotionally deprived, stupefied followers throw at them.

It's high time for a robust swing to the right in government. 


*Islam is patently a system that fosters territorial conquest and enslavement, based on what its adherents regard as a 'holy book,' a book which urges them to kill and subjugate non-believers (that's us). The UK government condones and protects this subversive doctrine, almost certainly out of fear, though with the backing of law. Thus the guest political system grows stronger, infiltrating every branch of officialdom. The mayor of London is currently a Muslim and the British public are half asleep: better not to notice!


Coming into being almost unnoticed is the complete feminisation of the Western World, with Europe in the lead and Great Britain in the forefront. Britain has become like an enormous, disgracefully overpopulated and chaotic HOME, run principally by women, with men becoming increasingly marginalised.

Don't worry, folks: Britain is doing its bit, breeding as fast as it can and calling in by default more people from wherever they're being ejected—all with government help and approval.

This country is bulging with disease of every kind, violent crime, murder, terrorism and sexual perversion (now fully accepted as a valid option, with the exception of rape and paedophilia, which incidentally is increasingly popular among men). Racial discrimination is rife, with official preference being given to ethnic minorities at the expense of the majority. When a nation is not at war the feminine tendencies gradually become prominent and Britain is now at the point of womanliness where recruiting into the armed forces now has to allow for sexual orientations other than the traditionally normal, so that the country's defence forces are on course to become a global laughing stock. The unadmitted idea is that Britain is still wealthy enough to buy off an aggressor (or a blackmailing EU), so it doesn't have to worry about having effective armed forces.

Anyone in Britain who publicly shows a bit of masculine vigour is roundly vilified, because Britain is now a woman's paradise of unlimited reproduction, fussy female management in most spheres of activity and a deteriorating infrastructure. Female politics decree that Muslim increase and infiltration into the country is okay, that returning jihadis must be given preference over the British homeless, that mass immigration must continue even if against the wishes of the passive majority and that criticism of Islam can be prosecuted as a crime; that foreign students at British universities can dictate and successfully argue for their personal and often racially-slanted preferences; that homosexuals may now parade up and down the main streets of the cities with the full and enthusiastic participation of the police (some of whom are themselves 'gay') and that the judicial system may hand down strange, quixotic sentences that plainly show how Britain has turned into more of a moral and intellectual mess than any of us could possibly have imagined. To think that such sacrifices of our best were made in two world wars for THIS!


Does that have any implication for our history and culture? 

And what a shock to see the leaders and deciders in session in the House of Commons! What a dreary lot of dreamy arguers they are! They seem to represent the worst aspects of the common trends of today. Decidedly not what the country needs. Yet, how did they get there? They were chosen by the apathetic population largely worn out with the stress of living in a collapsing cilvilisation. Exaggeration? No. The enormity of our problem can only be hinted at in a few words like these.

Is it really possible that no-one in this now-benighted land is aware of the degeneration that is taking over in every sphere? Is it possible that there are so very few who risk all to speak up about it in a country where deterioration has fatalistically been accepted as inevitable?

Russian bombers, warships and submarines frequent the seas around Britiain, but what on earth is the point of trying to intimidate a country as already hopeless as this? Well, we do have a couple of really huge aircraft carriers that will make excellent target practice, so perhaps it makes sense to keep an eye on them. 

A thoroughly feminised society cannot defend itself.

Note that in Russia there is conscription and men are trained to become as nasty and aggressive as possible. There is no room in Russian society for massed female protest marches— with a sprinkling of men in knitted pink hats, such as the one that recently took place in the USA. On the contrary, they constantly prepare for war.

The deep shame of Britain, on the other hand, is clearly discernible beneath the veneer of the round-the-clock partying, hysterical lust and celebrity-worship that passes for modern British culture. 

What can be done? Well, the first step towards effective remedy is acknowledgment of the problem in all its fullness—which is so very far from the case at the time of this writing. 
Among the many critical commentaries in circulation that deal with or touch upon the matters outlined above, those shown by 'The Iconoclast' on YouTube are undeniably some of the most true-to-target. A good example is the recent video— Dear President Trump - An Open Letter from a Brit.

Censorship is manifestly on the rise, but those who would suppress the true feelings, insights and contributions of anyone who sees into the state of Britain and makes their voice heard should note that suppression is never the answer, but can eventually bring about catastrophic reaction.


Pride of Russia. Where is the pride of Britain?

Just why is Russia so belligerent? They won the last war (with the largely unacknowledged participation and considerable help of the Western Allies) and that was quite a long time ago; since then they have been building up their armed forces, they have marched in and seized Ukraine’s Crimea (with a totally unbelievable referendum and their troops in a feeble disguise), they constantly stir up trouble in eastern Ukraine and they threaten to undermine the whole of Western civilisation with military probes and hacking. What is wrong with these people? Aside from the facts that Russia is at present a dictatorship that brooks no opposition and that a dictator is supported by his military and that the military must in turn be supported by huge expenditure, military exercises and new war toys, what kind of country is it—just for an instance—that can still look up to Stalin? This man, Josef Vissarionovich Dzugashvili, was a Georgian criminal who, on the bandwagon of the Communist Revolution, wangled his way to the top position in Russia, from which he oversaw and ordered the arrests, torture, enslavement and murder of millions of innocent Russian and Ukrainian citizens, as well as those of numerous other nationalities. Stalin ordered the starvation of millions of Ukrainians, among others, in order to feed his mad theory of collectivised farm production. 

Respect the National Identity and Culture of Ukraine!

This is not to mention the many other criminals who ran the Soviet Union with ruthless brutality under the banner of revolutionary communism, many of whom continue to be posthumously honoured in various ways. Russia’s present ruler has tried to prevent further research into what happened in the terrible years of communist repression, because it simply is too awful to accept as the true history of his country. But there are copious records of much of what went on and it is so utterly evil that it is easy to understand why he wants it suppressed. Putin apparently cannot give way now and admit the past evils as Germany did and moved on; an autocrat he must remain until circumstances force change.  Once out of power, he could just conceivably face prosecution as a criminal himself for many abuses of office, if ever more democratic policies should prevail. So the present situation is that those governing Russia maintain a strong sense of nationhood for the country, but pretend to see themselves in a state of siege, surrounded by potential enemies, just as the Kaiser’s Germany imagined itself to be; it built up an army of four million, which inevitably went to war, lost and nurtured a grudge that grew into another, even greater war. It is nothing short of absurd to think that yet another go at war could produce a winner and even Russia with all its bombast must know that. Russia's working philosophy seems to be that Man is an animal and animals win with a combination of brute force and stealth. What is universally worrying though, is that increasing cleverness in production masks the dangerous stupidity of emotionality in turmoil; humanity knows that in spite of its cleverness it is monumentally stupid. Its track record or history together with the state of the world today are abundant evidence.

At the other end of the scale from Russia, we have in Europe the formerly great Britain, which, being trapped in old-fashioned notions of democracy and fairness, is slowly disintegrating under the pressure of its out-of-control population numbers, as increasing hordes of migrants from poorer countries stream in to avail themselves of the benefits that Britain is still somehow able to afford to hand out. The idea of nationhood itself is under attack, being ousted by a heavy emphasis on publicising minority ethnicities, so that advertisements all over the country, both official and commercial, now usually feature people of African descent, as typified on the cover of a brochure from the Royal Bank of Scotland. This kind of advertising, though extremely peculiar and incongruous—as shown below—is becoming the apparently accepted norm in Britain.

Those who actively stand up for nationhood or patriotism are thoroughly suppressed, because it has been all but decided that Britain will fatalistically move on to become a mixed race of people who will have no interest in the country as an historical entity and who could be ruled by a well-to-do socialist elite, through a series of soviets descending in power and importance. This would happen because socialism is a concomitant of overpopulation rather than a clever socio-economic doctrine or theory. It would be a peculiarly British brand of socialism, that would have a generous attitude towards existing wealth and productivity, which after all would have to fund much of its policy. Conservatism always makes a comeback after the socialists have done enough damage, but if population numbers were to continue to rise, their feeble voice could be drowned out by the vociferous grievances of the masses.

The present Conservative government of Britain is very likely already too weak and divided in itself to resist the pressure of a populace whose politics is a dedicated self-interest that inevitably favours socialism. It is most unlikely that the said government is aware of this implication of uncontrolled population growth.

Liberty GB, which was founded and led by Paul Weston some four years ago, to bring notice to the growing threat of Islam in Britain, is closing in favour of Ann Marie Waters' new party For Britain. We left this comment on his website:

"Very sorry you weren't able to break through into national awareness, Paul. The trouble with Britain is actually even deeper, though. There's a fact that is more taboo even than patriotism in this country and that is OVERPOPULATION. 'Overcrowding' is probably a more accessible term for the sensitive thinker, but it easily dodges the issue. If this is not brought into public awareness it will bring still greater chaos than will the upcoming struggle against Islam. The matter of Islam should be dealt with in short order: it should be banned, a sensible period of notice having been given. However, it is obvious that most of Britain is in a heavy slumber, so the likelihood is that it will blunder on into widespread disorder, with a huge spectrum of criminality taking advantage of the breakdown. An associated problem is that Britain is increasingly being run by women; it seems that few men can stomach the heavy responsibility of governing, while women, being womb-driven, have their motivation ready supplied by their gender and anatomy! Just look at all the firm women now occupying important positions and then at their pathetic male counterparts. Any man who stands up for Britain and traditional British values is likely to be suppressed by the police, who after all, are the servants of blind reproduction. It is no accident that at the time of writing, the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police is Cressida Dick. There are other examples everywhere one looks. What I have written here is certain to meet with condemnation, but do take a moment to consider the points mentioned: they could be stating facts we all need to face and acknowledge."

Do we not have yet another example above of a man deserting his post (as Mr Farage deserted UKIP, even if he does do excellent work in the European Parliament) and being replaced by a woman? Well, there is little chance it will work. All efforts to make a sensible patriotic policy work are attacked by opposition from within and without, one of the destructive characteristics of democracy.

Gynocentric politics and unconscionable, ignorant motherhood—the present trend in European government being for housewives to run a country—will be the doom of humanity and it has a head start in rapidly deteriorating Britain. 

"Cooking, cleaning mums will be banned in advertisements across the UK from next year, following a study which claimed traditional gender roles are 'harmful and outdated.'

The decision to tighten regulation was announced by the Committees of Advertising Practice (CAP) this week, after a report published in summer identified gender stereotypes in adverts as a driver of inequality between men and women. 

To an intelligent observer, the above ban may seem utterly ridiculous and even rather insulting to both sexes, but women must be even more emancipated than ever before, particularly so that they can obtain positions where they can run countries. Then we shall see what a wonderful job women can do in maintaining order and encouraging prosperity! British men can be counted on to support women in their stressful, responsible positions: Women! You can count on us!

Put a woman on a pedestal, but don't be surprised if she kicks you in the teeth. (If that's what you actually want, count me out!)

'Diversity' Britain is a country now subjecting itself to forced ethnic integration, where even royalty has decided to mix race and very few citizens care to speak their own language properly. There are many sites on YouTube—one of the few truly public outlets for free speech, though that could change at any time—that express the growing fears of 'white genocide,' and there certainly does seem to be something like a peculiar death wish wafting around persuasively among those of European stock. One way in which this racial stock has been unknowingly, unwittingly undermined for decades is the prevalence and popularity of hypnotic, mind-numbing black music fashions, which are often very 'catchy,' which are avidly copied by the white man's music, and belted out on radio around the clock. The modern idea about race seems to be that it doesn't matter what race a person is; all people are basically 'good' and therefore deserve at least equal treatment and attention, if not better treatment and perks because of belonging to a minority. Good socialist thinking. And anyway it may well be too late to preserve the European stock because it is not only being forced out, but is actually assisting the process in various ways. From there, the argument goes on and on and Britain and other European countries continue to fill up with refugees from just about anywhere on earth. Anyone who wants to check Britain's stealth 'diversity' agenda can try posting a comment in the relevant section of the supposedly centre right newspaper, The Daily Mail. There, any pointed comment will be simply 'moderated' into oblivion. The Daily Mail doesn't want to be embroiled in controversy, but simply to saturate its readers with the scandal and sexual obsessions that are what Britain today is all about. 

"Diversity is a Code Word for White Genocide." This is the title of a YouTube video clip that has been 'blocked' for UK viewers. Well, the title and the fact that it has been removed just about says it all, doesn't it? 

"The media are cowards and are terrified of telling the truth about Islam."  —Liberty, GB 

Deviation from the policy that government is driving in can now all too easily be labelled by police as 'hate crime.' One wonders how nasty it can get, this official policy of silencing its own citizens. Whatever the case, it is clear that Britain's ignorance is just begging for trouble. Russia has special, highly trained and notoriously brutal forces for quick suppression of any opposition; will Britain be able to do likewise? 

National Action is or was a 'far right, neo-Nazi' organisation that was recently (December 2016) proscribed, or banned, by the Home Secretary (who is of course a woman) as a terrorist organisation.

"As Home Secretary, I am clear that the safety and security of our families, communities and country comes first. So today I am taking action to proscribe the neo-Nazi group National Action. This will mean that being a member of, or inviting support for, this organisation will be a criminal offence.

"National Action is a racist, anti-Semitic and homophobic organisation which stirs up hatred, glorifies violence and promotes a vile ideology,* and I will not stand for it. It has absolutely no place in a Britain that works for everyone."  

* This wouldn't resemble Islam, by any chance, would it? 

Clarity was unable to check on the veracity of Amber Rudd's charges against NA, or indeed to find out much about it at all, because it was banned before it had a chance to do so. It may be noted that labels like 'far Right,' 'neo-Nazi' and 'fascist' are really vulgar slogans in use principally by the advancing socialist ethic and their use surely bolsters the self-righteous stance of the Left, who after all, are only in this insofar as it 'works for everyone.' However, the religion of Islam, which is by its own holy book, a political system based on terror, is allowed to flourish undisturbed, because its danger is ignored and its ready recourse to extreme violence is greatly feared by the forces of law and order. As long as Islam is permitted to grow in numbers it has every reason to remain peaceful in appearance, but when the numbers have grown enough to enable it to vote itself into power democratically, its fundamentally violent nature will become abundantly clear to a people who will feel foolish and fearful for having pretended for so long that there was no threat. 

There are constant threats issued by Islamic clerics and those they have influenced and their illegal shar'ia law operates clandestinely in Britain.

The men who fought and died in two world wars to save Britain from foreign domination would be horrified if they could see what is happening here today. The honour that is traditionally paid to them in ritual and ceremony is mere empty show if the British do not honour and maintain the values they fought for.


No-one can escape the rising pressure of living. Even when relaxing from work, much entertainment or distraction is needed to conceal the increasing pressure that affects all aspects of living. There is a constant tide of new births which produces a wave of pressure that travels all over the earth and this would probably be interpreted as the principle source of creative energy that maintains progress. The new births MUST happen, so everyone and everything else MUST keep adjusting. The waves of pressure are unprecedented because population numbers are unprecedented. There is a very firm taboo against criticism of the insanity of compulsive motherhood, meaning preclusion of a possible escape route for some of the pressure. Recognition of that possible escape route would signal the coming into maturity of the human experience, manifesting as intelligent responsibility, but it is not available since the present state of the race depends upon its ignorance of the obvious, regardless of the assumption of rationality. Because of the relentless rise of pressure or compulsion, the number of cases of dementia of all types also rises, as well as other kinds of diseases almost too numerous to list. It is also accountable for the obsession with food and the overeating that gives rise to the obesity that is seen everywhere in the developed world. But all of that is relegated to the specialists while unregulated birth is humanity's foremost imperative.

Pressure arising from the shrinking of the experience value of time and space due to overpopulation comes with growing crowds of protesters and hordes of migrants and refugees who impose harsher, more desperate values upon the host country. The attitudes of the leaders of the countries which are currently being overwhelmed by foreign population excess shows quite clearly that, while enjoying the importance and wealth that comes with power, they are intellectually, morally and emotionally confused. Democracy is in the process of self-destruction through its inability to make sound judgments and to implement them; instead the democratic process is maintained through wasteful argument, which often results in bad decisions. This is not to say that other forms of government, notably autocracy, are any better; they may be prone to sudden acts of violence towards neighbours—as we see in the recent case of Crimea— while democrats tend to believe that "jaw jaw is better than war war." The emancipation of women has resulted in increasing confusion about sex and reproduction; images of lewd women are now the norm of sexual propaganda in progressive societies. Under the democratic process, Sodom and Gomorrah are forced upon the majority under the banner of 'gay pride.'

The maturity of the human experience signifies the development of commonsense, through acceptance of the need for calm assessment of each and every situation, to the point where it is able to see that the assumption of consciousness is the basic cause of human failure and that the study of consciousness and behaviour (they are inseparable) offers the only possibility of wholesome change.


Time at last (well, almost) for the Great British exit from the big dream of a European Union and we see Juncker expressing ever more bitterness as he sees the collapse of his personal dream of himself as Europe's Putin, exercising an iron, unopposable rule over a congeries of unruly states. Several countries which do not have an autocratic form of government have been and currently are faced with the problem of putting up suitable candidates for the top post; such candidates as are chosen are seldom ideally suited for it, so the electorate has to make the best of poor choices. This was evident in the case of America and now we see it in France. Strong, but sensible government is now needed more than ever in Europe and it is to be hoped that a broad understanding will grow of the unsuitability of socialism for democratic government in countries in serious social crises such as France. If democracy is rule by argument, socialism is bureaucratic argument only, since any proposition is always, in theory, forever arguable. In Britain, signs are that government aware of the seriousness of its social problems is already in place, but of course the same cannot be said of Germany, where the unbelievably irresponsible actions of Merkel will have terrible consequences. The question of whether the European nations will be able to save the essential elements of their culture from the inroads of Islamic imperialism is inescapably tied to whether they will ever be able to concede a point where population increase and density can be seen for what it is: overpopulation. If and when humanity comes of age, that is what it will have to be considering; until then, a solution can only remain in potential.